Come to Jesus

This looks terrible, I know, but the genuine truth is that it happens at the beginning of nearly every quarter, nearly every year. We are about to start the third week of the third quarter. At the end of a quarter kids get used to the idea that no one assignment is going to have a huge impact on their grades. Then they forget how averages work and suddenly they’ve missed one assignment and bam all by itself they’re down to a D or an F, because there have only been two or three assignments that went into the grade book in week two of the quarter.

And one of the things people don’t realize about teaching is just how much acting is involved. Because I know exactly what’s going on here, and I know it’s going to get fixed, but did I begin every single non-Algebra class with a five-minute “Fix this or I will end you” lecture? One where I demonstrated that if I want to terrify my students my most effective tool is not to yell at them but, rather, to lower my voice? Did I use the word “pathetic” a whole lot more often on Friday than I usually do in a typical day, much less a typical week?(*) Yep. Sure did, to all those things, and not a single peep was uttered by 96% of my students (actually, let’s do the math, since I bounced three kids to the office during the lectures … ninety-eight percent) during any of it, because in stark contrast to most of my previous schools, very few of these kids have ever seen me genuinely pissed.

Which, uh, I wasn’t.

But I’m good at this, so believe me, they didn’t know.

I’d say a third of those kids got their grades up to passing during their math classes on Friday, and another third will be up to snuff by the end of the weekend. The rest will require some more individual work. But most of my classes this year haven’t had more than one or two kids failing, and I’ve seen more than one, miraculously, where at the end of the quarter every single student was passing. So they’ll fix it. And then fourth quarter I’ll have to scare the shit out of them all over again. 

(*) I have never described an individual student as “pathetic,” just for the record. I have used that word to describe specific work outputs, however, and I’m entirely comfortable with using it to describe the current grades of an entire class.

On musicals

alexander-hamilton-portrait-john-trumbull.jpgBriefly, I hope: it hit me on the way home from work tonight that I never actually said anything about how we found Wicked.  We sort of got our tickets by accident; I thought the show was in town for a much longer run and randomly remarked to my wife that I wouldn’t mind going, and before I knew it we had tickets to the show’s last night, which was last Friday.  It was here for something like a two-week run.

I was quite pleased with it.  Showing up in a green shirt with a black tie was a happy coincidence, but I didn’t mind that I’d accidentally marked myself as a fan, because by the end of the show I was.  I’d have preferred slightly better seats; the Morris Civic Auditorium doesn’t really have any bad seats, per se, and we were in the front row of our balcony, but leg room was getting to me a bit and I spent the entire intermission standing up and walking around because otherwise I’d have had to have a leg amputated by the end of the show and I suspect the ushers would have frowned on that.  But it was a great performance; every time I see anything on stage by even semi-professionals I’m amazed at what people are able to do with sets and lighting and such and when it’s actual Broadway professionals doing the work it’s simply outstanding.  I’m really glad we went.

And then I got home and over the last couple of days I’ve been giving the Hamilton soundtrack another whirl after being unable to get through it the first couple of times I tried; again, listening in the car has transformed how I approach a piece of music.  I’m not going to say much, because I want to listen a few more times and then write a longer piece, but I suspect I’m becoming a Hamiltonian.  Like, I listened to it in the car, and I get it now, and yeah, y’all were right.  But more on that later.

Meanwhile, I’m finding that I’m really looking forward to the Rocky Horror Picture Show revival… thingamajig.  I’ve seen the film a million times but have (somehow) never seen it on stage, and the idea of Laverne Cox playing Dr. Frank-N-Furter is fascinating.  So there’s a post coming for that probably eventually as well.

 

In which I have a word

photoDear National Park Service:

Let’s have a talk about Ford’s Theatre.

Actually, no.  Let’s talk about me first.  That picture, to the right, there, is my Lincoln Shelf.  The bust on the left was bought at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum, oh, ten years or so ago.

I want this clear: most people do not own a full shelf of books.  I own a full shelf of books just about Abraham Lincolnand if you were to count the two or three additional shelves that are about the Civil War and Reconstruction, I probably easily own forty to fifty volumes of history in which the man plays a prominent part.  I am, in short, a fan of Mr. Lincoln’s.

I am also, and this is more relevant than it may initially seem, a middle school math teacher.  As such (here’s why it’s relevant) I am well and truly accustomed to being in a position where I am required to deliver important information to an audience that may, for one reason or another, be shall we say less than fully invested in hearing what I have to say to them.  I am accustomed to having to deliver that message to them anyway, and am well-versed in any number of techniques for recapturing their interest when I may have temporarily lost it.

Let’s talk about the fella you’ve got giving your talks to your tour groups, guys.  Or, rather, let’s talk about the fella who has given our talk the last two times I’ve been there– which were separated by four years, since we did not go to Ford’s Theatre the last time I was in Washington.  That said, the fact that we got the exact same dude both of the times I’ve been there makes me think that it’s likely that he does the lion’s share of them.  I’m not going to name this guy, although I can probably find his name on the Internet easily enough.  I’m sure he’s a good guy and he’s clearly impressively knowledgeable about what happened that night in April of 1865.

Let’s tear off the Band-Aid right quick: He sucks, and you should get rid of him.

Again: I’m sure he’s lovely in person.  His family’s probably fond of him.  I’m sure he’s nice to his dogs and, y’know, gives to charity and goes to church every Sunday and all that stuff.  I don’t want you thinking I dislike him personally.  But it takes a special kind of person to get up in front of a bunch of people and give a talk about a historical topic and make it engaging.  And this guy is not that person.

For the second trip in a row to Ford’s Theatre, 80% of my kids were sound asleep within five minutes of what ended up being nearly a thirty minute lecture about the night of Lincoln’s assassination.  I looked around at one point.  I would say that 80% figure was accurate to within a few points for everyone under eighteen that I could see, and even about a third of the adults were nodding off.

My tour guide fell asleep.  Let me say that again: my tour guide, a man so invested in American history that he has literally made it his career to travel around on exhaustingly tight schedules and talk to kids about it, fell asleep.

I stayed awake.  Rage is motivating.

You need to understand something, Ford’s Theatre.  Unlike, say, my math classes, virtually everyone in that theatre was there because they wanted to be.  They chose to go see your presentation.  And, also much unlike my math classes, a large number of the people in that room were there on weekend trips, meaning that they’d been to a whole lot of different places before you, were going to see many places after you, and very likely were just as sleep-deprived as my students, who had had maybe eight hours of sleep if they were lucky in the past two days and had spent twelve hours on a bus to get to you.

The fact that this phenomenon has occurred both times that I have seen this lecture, and that furthermore the lecture was exactly word-for-word the same both times I saw it– I remembered enough turns of phrase to be confident that this was the case– makes me think that it is very likely that my two experiences were not random aberrations.  That you are, in fact, allowing a National Park Service ranger to literally bore his audience to sleep on a regular– if not a constant— basis.

This is unacceptable.

It is also incomprehensible.  If it were my job to stand in front of an audience every day and tell them something, and if every day that I stood in front of that audience and told them that thing it put them to sleep, I would change something!  It bewilders me on a nearly cellular level that this man is still doing this talk the same way.  Perhaps there are bright lights shining in his eyes and he has literally never seen the people in front of him.  Perhaps he is blind!  Perhaps someone who has the power to remove or replace him owes him money, or has been caught by him in some sort of compromising position.  Perhaps simply no one else wants the job.  I have no idea.  But… Christ, if a single student falls asleep in my classes I take it personally and I adjust.  I would literally not be able to live with this if this was how my day went.  I cannot comprehend how he can.

Perhaps it is time to consider that hitting an audience of tired, if enthusiastic, people with a thirty minute lecture may perhaps not be the best way to keep their attention.  You may not care about keeping their attention!  That is also possible.  But I would like to presume that you do.

Perhaps it is time to consider that if you have hired a man to talk about one of the most exciting stories in American history– for God’s sake, the most famous actor in America killed the President in a roomful of people, how can you make that boring?– and that man routinely lulls his audience to sleep, it may be time to try something else.

A suggestion:  I would like to point out that the location of these talks is, in fact, an active theatre.  (I don’t know if there’s a difference between a “theatre” and a “theater.”  I’d prefer to spell it the ‘merkin way.  I’m just gonna stick with that from here on out if that’s okay.)  Do you know what kind of person you have access to in an active theater?  Actors.

Reenact the goddamn assassination, is what I’m getting at here.  I understand that the stage may be set for some other play; I feel like dedicated people should be able to work around this a bit.  The dude’s made the point both times I’ve heard him (because it was the exact same speech) that My American Cousin was a funny play, and that John Wilkes Booth waited for the funniest moment in the play to shoot the President.

Maybe we could, I dunno, actually see a couple minutes of the play?  If the band plays Hail to the Chief when Lincoln walks in, maybe put that over the PA system or something like that?  Some accompanying audio here and there?  There’s a bit where he sneaks under the goddamn stage while the play is in session to get to the President.  I get that we probably can’t get all those folks under the stage to watch, but maybe send a crew down there and get some video of an actor dressed as Booth sneaking around?  I’m pretty sure the National Park Service can afford a projector and a drop-down screen.

You think anybody’s gonna be asleep if we get a few minutes of the actual (supposedly funny) play, with an actor playing Lincoln sitting in the booth, and then Booth actually sneaks in, shoots him in the head, and leaps onto the stage?  You’ll have kids climbing over themselves to find out what “Sic semper tyrannis!” means.  I’m sure you can find a stunt man somewhere who can make that jump reliably without hurting himself.  This is manageable, guys.  Maybe you feel like that box is a sacred space and you don’t want an actor up there; okay, fine.  Make a portable one and wheel it on stage.  Keep it off to the side when you don’t need it.  Do something.

I am on the verge of telling my tour company I never want to go back to this place with a group of kids again, and if I do, they should explicitly mark it as “nap time” on the itinerary.  That’s a damn shame.

This shouldn’t be this hard.  Fix it.

On teaching and money (and Miley and Sinead)

ku-bigpic

I am– forgive me for knowing about this, much less bringing it up– kind of really enjoying the Sinead O’Connor/Miley Cyrus thing going on right now.  The first one was just interesting in an intellectual sort of “hey, this happened” kind of way; the second one interests me as a writer.  I knew Sinead O’Connor was kinda fucked up but I wasn’t aware she had a bitchy side and I certainly wasn’t aware that her bitchy side was awesome.  The second letter has this wonderful sort of “Ok, look, we can end this now, but here are my knives if you are foolish” sort of feel to it, as if O’Connor has absorbed Cyrus’ semiliterate trailer trash Twitter response to her initial letter, shrugged, and moved Miley to her mental “destroy” file.  The phrase “you have one last chance” doesn’t appear anywhere in the letter, but it should.  I really hope there’s a third.

I mean, Christ, the line “You could really do with educating yourself, that is if you’re not too busy getting your tits out to read” is art.


I voted to approve the contract, but I’m not terribly happy about it.  Oh, it’s not bad, as they go– we’re getting a small stipend this year basically just for the hell of it and we actually get our first real raise in seven years (two whole percent!) next year, that is assuming we don’t get placed in one of the two lowest evaluation categories.  More money is good.  I like money, even if 2% after having frozen salaries since 2007 is kind of bullshit.  It’s still better than the no-money we’ve been getting on the last several contracts.

The problem is that this round of negotiation really has driven home one important fact for me:  That two percent hike got eaten by inflation years ago.  We are never really getting a raise again, and by “we” in this case I basically mean all of Indiana’s teachers.  I get a yearly pay raise at my fucking minigolf job, people.  The way things used to work, we got yearly step increases until you hit sixteen years of experience and after that you’re depending on actual increases to the pay scale (ie, “raises”) for any further increase in salary.  What this meant is that if you stuck it out long enough eventually everybody made the same amount– sixteen years is a long time, granted, but it leveled you out sooner or later.

Now?  Anyone in my district who makes more money than me right now is going to make more than me forever, and anyone under me– particularly anyone unfortunate enough to have started in the last few years since even step increases became impossible– is going to make less than me forever.  There’s no merit pay of any kind that can increase salary– not that I even think that’s a good idea, mind you– and no bonuses for good performance.  There’s only the stick; you don’t get any raise of any kind if you end up in the lowest two evaluation categories, but it’s not like you get more money if you get a superior ranking.

It’s unfair in a way that I really, really don’t like.  Teaching is already a career with effectively no mobility– a teacher is a teacher is a teacher and while most districts do name team leaders and things like that (a job I’ve held myself on a few occasions) there is no actual salary increase attached to that.  As a teacher, I’ll never be anyone’s boss unless I move to administration– which isn’t teaching.  There’s literally no way to be promoted.  Which means that the fact that there are teachers in my district who not only make ten grand more than me but will make ten grand more than me forever really stick in my craw.  Similarly, I’m mentoring a first-year teacher this year; I make fifteen thousand dollars a year or so more than she does and I will make fifteen thousand dollars a year or so more than her forever, until she wises up and realizes that spending her entire life making $32,000 a year is untenable.  (She gets a raise to $34,000 in 2014-15; the poor schmucks stuck in the bottom two pay steps get a little bump.  But she’ll be stuck there forever.)  Once she realizes that she can make better money and have much less stress in her life doing something else, she’ll be gone, and she’ll be replaced by another 22-year-old making the same $34K that she did until she quit.

Note, also, that while teachers making more than base pay will be quitting a lot, or retiring, they will only be being replaced by teachers making base pay.  Which means that you travel far enough down the road– and I bet it won’t be more than seven or ten years– and something perilously close to all of us will be stuck at that base pay level.  Which people will put up with until they have kids, then they’ll move on to jobs where they’re actually treated like educated professionals, and kiss teaching in a public school district goodbye.

Which is a feature, and not a bug.  This is what they want, and this is what state law is written to do.

I fucking hate Indiana.