Here is my normal approach to starred reviews. I admit that this is probably more generous than many, but I’m not worried about it. For every guy like me who hands five-star reviews out to a third of the books he reads, there will be someone else who reserves them for books that should win awards. It balances out.
- A five-star book is not only a book that I really enjoyed, but (this is critical) a book that I will evangelize and recommend to others.
- A four-star book is one that I enjoyed, but not necessarily enough to be evangelical about it.
- A three-star book is a book that I finished.
I usually don’t review two-star or one-star books, because most of the time I didn’t finish them. I have to hate a book to finish it if I don’t like it; generally I finish it with horrified fascination as the overriding emotion. Sometimes I like a book on some levels but abhor it on others; sometimes I just like looking at a train wreck.
I just gave The Three-Body Problem five stars on Goodreads, despite having some reservations about it, and I want to take a minute to explain why. The book was originally written in Chinese and translated into English by Ken Liu, who I understand is of no relation to Cixin Liu. And therein lies the first problem: there is no way to read this and not immediately recognize that it’s a translated work. This is no slight on Liu, who is clear in the translator’s note (there’s a translator’s note) that preserving the Chinese character of the book was a priority, and the book isn’t hard to read, but I feel like the “this was obviously not written in English” character of the text is going to turn some people off. This is especially clear in dialogue; English speakers simply don’t talk like the characters in this novel.
(See what I mean? Not complaints, not flaws. Reservations.)
The plot of the book is occasionally slightly impenetrable, particularly the first 20% or so, which require some background knowledge of the Chinese Cultural Revolution in order to properly appreciate– or, at least, I assume it’s required, since I don’t have it and found the first part a big of a slog. Once the book jumps forward into… now? Near future? I’m not sure– it becomes much easier going. I finished the book in about a day and a half, so it couldn’t have been that rough.
The other thing? The science. My favorite book of last year was Andy Weir’s The Martian, which I recommended enthusiastically to everyone, with the caveat that the book would involve math and chemistry and you should be prepared for that. Half of the characters in The Three-Body Problem are physicists. There’s a whole bit toward the end that is all about unfolding a proton from 11-dimensional space down to 2-dimensional space so that it can be turned into a supercomputer. They fail to do it right twice. That happens.
I am also not quite sure that Cixin Liu has ever played a computer game. I won’t go into that particular gripe any more than that sentence, but there’s a lot of stuff going on with a VR game and it’s… weird.
But here’s the thing: this book? It’s inventive as hell. There are aliens. They’re coming for us. And they don’t get anywhere near us during the first book, which is part one of a trilogy. And the whole thing is just as clever as hell in a whole lot of ways and I can’t wait to read the second book even though there were parts of it I don’t like and I’m going to have to be real careful about who I recommend it to.
So I’m calling that five stars. Your mileage may vary, I suppose, but you should check the book out anyway.
7 thoughts on “REVIEW: Cixin Liu’s THE THREE-BODY PROBLEM”
I am intrigued, by the Chinese-ness and the inventiveness and the physicists. I’ll give this one a shot. With reservations, as you and I seem to have opposite tastes: I enjoyed the absurdity of ‘Snowpiercer’ while ‘The Martian’ bored me silly. I only got about 80 pages in before deciding I had better things to read. I like your books, though, so you can’t be all wrong. 😉
I’ve finished plenty of books I don’t like. I guess I’m an optimist; I keep hoping they’ll be worth it in the end (‘John Dies at the End,’ ‘Mists of Avalon’). Or I read things that seem good but turn out lame (‘The Golem and the Djinni’ – though it’s still well-written enough to get 3 stars). Or a story might be enjoyable enough to finish, but too poorly written to recommend (‘The Vesuvius Club’). My Goodreads account is full of one- and two-star ratings. Lately, though, I’ve been much more willing to set things aside; my TBR list far is too long to waste time on dull or annoying things. My rankings work like this:
5-star: it’s amazing, magical, I love it. ‘Dune’ qualifies, and ‘The Night Circus,’ and most things by Neil Gaiman.
4-star: I like it a lot. Good story, well written, good characters, good ending. ‘Skylights’ qualifies, lots of Laurie King and Terry Pratchett.
3-star: I like it well enough but it’s not among my favorites
2-star: I didn’t like it but it wasn’t all bad – someone else might like it. A lot of Stephen King’s ‘Dark Tower’ series landed here but I still had to finish it.
1-star: zero qualities to recommend
Isn’t it fun having opinions? 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Man. “The Golem and the Djinni” was my favorite book of 2013. We really are polar opposites. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I mostly liked it – it’s a great concept and really well-written – but the non-ending irritated me. I also thought she passed up a gorgeous opportunity to mess with gender stereotypes. A good book that leaves a bad aftertaste is almost worse than a book that’s bad from the start.
I have a writing exercise/project plan to rewrite chunks of it with the roles reversed. I’m curious to see how it would work.
[…] Liu has had a hell of a year. You may recall my review of Cixin Liu’s The Three-Body Problem, which I loved, and which I note seems to have grown […]
[…] to this day I can’t quite explain why. Cixin Liu’s The Three-Body Problem was also excellent, although rereading my review just now it appears to have grown on me since I initially read […]
[…] going to love it. I just bailed on Cixin Liu’s The Dark Forest, which is a sequel to one of the best books I’ve read this year, but not translated by the same guy, and the new translator is awful. I’m sure it’s […]
[…] The Three-Body Problem, by Cixin Liu, translated by Ken Liu. This book is weird; when I reviewed it I gave it five stars, but with some reservations, and there were points during the year where Three-Body Problem could […]
Comments are closed.