Even more standardized testing nonsense

do-not-read-400x301…because I can never, ever stop talking about this.

You may recall, if you’ve been reading for a bit, my post where I declared all grades to be arbitrary bullshit.  Yes, all grades.  Go ahead and click the link for additional explanation, or just click here to get the whole three-part series.  What is also arbitrary bullshit, always, is how we determine what is a “pass” and a “fail” on a standardized test.

Lemme back up.

I didn’t do any teaching today.  The first round of the ISTEP test is next week.  It’s what they call the “Applied Skills” portion of the test, with the multiple choice part coming in either the last week of April or the first week of May; I don’t remember.  Basically, the Applied Skills portion of ISTEP is the story problems part.  It’s still paper-based and the kids have to write everything out and show all of their work, which is why it’s so much earlier than the rest of the test– because it can’t be graded by a machine.

I spent all day today with The Hunger Games playing on my class DVD player, calling my kids back for what are called test talks— a brief three- or four-minute conference with me where we went over their ISTEP score from last year, their performance on the three Acuity tests over the course of this year, and– and this was a new wrinkle I threw in this year– their performance, specifically, on the Applied Skills portion of last year’s ISTEP.

It will not surprise you, I think, regardless of whether you teach or not, to discover that kids (not just mine) tend to have a harder time with open-ended story problems than they do with (somewhat) more objective multiple-choice problems.  For one, you can’t guess your way through an open-ended question, and just multiplying together every number you can find– the go-to “I don’t get this” reaction– is not often the right response.   I had many, many conversations today where I praised a kid on their high ISTEP score, then flipped the scoresheet over to the other side and watched their faces fall when I showed them their scores on the objective portion of the test.  My reason for doing this?  Those are the money points.  Nearly all of my kids can substantially improve their ISTEP scores just by being a little bit more conscientious on the applied skills test they take on Tuesday.  It’s literally a matter of moving some zeroes to ones.  Individual points on this test count more toward their overall score than a single question on a multiple-choice test will, so if they focus on doing their best on Tuesday they’ve got a really good chance of bringing up their overall score.

Back to arbitrary bullshit:  I discovered today, and I’d suspected this before but I hadn’t actually seen proof, that it is possible to pass the ISTEP for mathematics in seventh and eighth grade and get no points whatsoever on the entire Applied Skills portion of the test.  I have at least two kids who pulled that off– literally zero Applied Skills points, but a pass on the overall test.  No points at all for “Figure the area of a rectangle that is four feet by three feet,” but we’ll pass you if you can figure out that C, 12, is the answer if the problem is 4×3.

You tell me how useful a “pass” actually is under those circumstances.


Discover more from Welcome to infinitefreetime dot com

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Even more standardized testing nonsense

  1. I love how we spend all our time teaching to a test that the students can just pass by guessing… Meanwhile, policymakers don’t understand why, even though the test is harder, the kids are coming out dumber. I know my kids have given up, and we’re still a couple weeks away from the test. They’re already telling me they just plan to guess, even though that could hurt my scores as a teacher. Are the kids’ scores part of your yearly evaluation as well?

    Like

  2. I think subject-based testing in general kinda sucks; those who do well in life are those with personal experience and a broad range of skills from computer competence to being able to talk to other humans, not necessarily those who can rote-learn all of the content for some arbitrarily-divided up ‘subjects’.

    It seems that governments try to make their populations more effective in employment by reinforcing the difficulty and division of the arbitrary subjects they teach at school – doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

    Like

HERE IS WHERE YOU TALK: