This… MEANS something…

Someone figured out how to pull stickers off a sheet.

IMG_1963.JPG

On social media and kids’ shows

You may find this a useful post, or you may find it to be an excellent reminder of why thinking about, much less stressing out over, social media is an incredible waste of your time.  We’ll see.

Twitter has recently sort of upgraded its Analytics page.  They did it in a sort of annoying way, giving us a lot more granular data on how individual Tweets do, but removing the only feature I actually used Analytics for, which was to track day-by-day follows and unfollows.  They still haven’t put that back, which sorta pisses me off.

(Also: immaturity moment, because I need one: hurr durr he said anal.  That is all.)

Anyway.  I have, at this exact second, 1143 followers on the Twittermachine.  One of the things that the new Analytics page keeps track of is impressions for each Tweet.  An impression means that at some point your Tweet scrolled across the screen of somebody who was looking at Twitter.  It doesn’t mean that they read it, or clicked, or really did anything at all– it literally just means that it is at least theoretically possible that someone saw it.

With 1143 followers, after five or six hours most of my Tweets reliably have in between 60 and 80 impressions, assuming that they haven’t been retweeted by someone. This means that about six percent of my followers are going to see any given Tweet.  (Unknown: whether someone seeing a Tweet multiple times counts more than once.  I’m assuming that it does not.)

That is not very many.  You can increase the number of people who are going to see a Tweet with hashtags, which means that anyone who searches for that hashtag in the, oh, five minutes or so after you send it will see it, maybe.  In general, until yesterday, adding a hashtag or two would generally add thirty or forty impressions to a Tweet, and also seems to slightly elevate the chance that a Tweet will be favorited or retweeted.

This will seem like a change of subject; it’s not.  Bear with me.  I posited the following in the comments of my post about Curious George the other day:

Siler’s Law: as any discussion of children’s programming continues, the chance of someone making a disparaging comment about Caillou very rapidly approaches 1.

This genuinely is a law, guys.  It’s amazing how much people seem to hate Caillou, and you absolutely cannot talk about children’s programming without someone at some point mentioning what a terrible goddamn show it is.  It’s nearly impossible.

And my son has never displayed the slightest interest in watching it, so my wife and I have been spared this particular terror in our childrearing.  So, two nights ago, we decided that after we put him to bed we would deliberately expose ourselves to this terrible thing.  What the hell, I thought, maybe it’ll make for a blog post.

Heh.

Short version, because this isn’t actually the point: early Caillou is, indeed, completely unbearable.   Later seasons eliminate some of the stuff that makes the early episodes bad, but oh man are the early episodes bad.

While we were watching, I posted the following two Tweets:

As of this morning, with– and this is important– not a single retweet– these two posts have 1,707 and 1,714 views, respectively.

Not one retweet.

I posted this last night, when I discovered this phenomenon:

That Tweet currently has 1,039 impressions, with no retweets, and has only been online for about eleven and a half hours– most of which in the dead of night in the continental US.

What this implies is that there are an extraordinary number of people who, for some reason, are searching Twitter for the #caillou hashtag.

So searched Twitter for the #caillou hashtag.  Something’s going on here, right?

Go ahead; try it yourself.  Long story short: shit still don’t make no sense.

And that’s why no one should waste time worrying about social media.

Why hello there!

Found this little dude eating bugs on my bedroom window when I got home from work last night.

20140713-092845-34125810.jpg

Presented more or less without comment, pt. 2

I feel like these two objects maybe do not need to be in the same room.  I, at least, do not ever need to use both of those things at the same time.  Maybe that’s what makes this place fine dining; I dunno.

photo

The Day Papa Bear Lost It

Children’s books are so screwed-up sometimes:

20140607-125541-46541182.jpg

In which I release a dove

The floodwaters appear to have receded as of about 11:00 PM last night, still with no explanation.  I had nearly a thousand hits yesterday (previous record was 708) with no discernible uptick in interaction with the site.  As of right now, a much-more-typical 28 page views.

Weeeeeird.

Thus endeth this week’s blogwankery.  I promise to not mention traffic again for a while.

A totally screwed-up thing my brain just did

ugo-hob_288x288So, I’M AWAKE, universe, and yanked out of a sound sleep because I swear the waking parts of my brain just went to war against the non-waking parts of my brain and hit the “abort” key on sleep for the night.

The dream started like this: my wife and I were in Chicago, alone with one of my students, a kid who I won’t detail at all other than to say he’s a pain in the ass and a lot of the time I don’t like him very much.  Actually, I’ll say this, too: I don’t dislike him enough that he’s generally on my mind when I’m outside of work, so it’s deeply weird that he’s showing up in a dream.

Anyway, we were on the train, headed somewhere to have lunch.  I get off the train and I discover that I’ve lost the two of them.   The neighborhood we’re in looks sorta like the nicer/more commercial parts of Milwaukee Avenue, if you’re a Chicagoan and that means anything.  I know where we’re supposed to meet but can’t remember the name of the place.  I look around, getting rather frantic about the whole thing, then call my wife, who is standing in the doorway of the place– it’s across the street from me– waving me over.  It’s called the Indian Tea Room, a fact that I remember instantly as soon as she tells me where she is.   Note that to the best of my knowledge no such place exists in Chicago or anywhere else.

I enter the place to discover that the bottom floor is a long, ridiculously narrow store, and that I’ve lost my wife again.  There is a table of bangles and Indian-style jewelry and good luck charms by the door, card tables full of random junk lining one wall, the sales counter along the other wall, and a high, narrow table covered with comic book short boxes running down the middle of the place.  The aisles are too narrow for me to walk through in a normal fashion; my shoulders are too wide– so I have to turn my body to get through, and push past a couple of people who are shopping.  The comic books are all labeled by title and I’ve not heard of any of them, but I remember feeling weird that none of them were Indian comic books.

The entrance to the restaurant is in the back; it’s on the second floor.  So I have to push past everyone.  I climb up to the second floor and discover it’s a big square room.  Now, the following two things contradict each other, but: dream.  First of all, everything is black and white, and the furniture in the place is like what you might expect from an old music store, except that there’s not anything at all on any of the racks and there are a few beds scattered around.  Also, every single object in the room is prominently labeled.  Like, the racks have a big card on them that says “RACK” and the beds say “BED” and the floor says “FLOOR” every few feet.

This is the contradictory part: I can see all of this, but it’s pitch black in the room.  My wife and my student are sitting on one of the beds.  Note that, again, dream-logic; this was perfectly normal.  When you go to a restaurant what you do is you sit on the bed in the dark until someone brings you food.

Anyway, we sat on the bed for a few minutes until a server came upstairs and flipped the lights on.   She was startled to see us and made some comment about three people sitting on the bed in the dark, at which point it went from being perfectly normal to totally shameful.  My wife and my student were ready to order already, but I didn’t know where the menu was, so I wasn’t ready.  It turns out the menu is on the wall by the stairs, so I go over and look at it.

It’s completely incomprehensible.  I mean, I can tell you thinking about it that most of the stuff on it was typical Indian fare; rice and lamb and various vegetarian dishes and a few other things, but in the dream it was impossible.  Another customer came upstairs with a thick notebook and began carefully explaining to another server what she wanted; it wasn’t on the menu at all but apparently you could just bring your own recipes to this place if you want.

I stared at the menu for maybe twenty minutes of dream-time, getting more and more frustrated with myself for not being able to pick anything, then gave up and went back to my wife.  The bed had transformed into a regular restaurant table with a white tablecloth on it; the only splashes of color in the room were the food.  They’d ordered already, and gotten their food, and there was a big pot of rice and some meatball thingies sizzling in oil.

I got very, very angry.  I remember snatching one of the meatballs out of the pot with my bare hands, wondering for a brief second why I wasn’t burned, and throwing it down on the table, while screaming and cursing about, of all things, the bad service at the restaurant.  At which point the part of my brain that doesn’t like being mad at my wife made me wake up.

I’d say “Fuck this, I’m going back to bed,” but bed is where this happened, so apparently I need to find something to do.

Not sure if this is funny or depressing or both

Screen Shot 2014-02-09 at 7.36.10 PM

I mean, I’ve spent a lot of time on the internets, so it ain’t like I don’t know where to find it, but folks, this really is not the place for advice about vices and gay porn.

Really.

I promise.

(The answer is “do.”)